Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 868 F.2d 938 - Zinser v. Rose

Zinser v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

868 F.2d 938 · 1989

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
June 2001
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2001

15 federal appellate · 2 district ·

150198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc · Brown Shoe Co. v. United States · Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. · California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.