Moon v. Breathless Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.3d 209 · 2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb · Giles v. Kearney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“claim that she should be treated as an employee actually arises 'under the Agreement' because it refers to [her] as an 'independent contractor[ ]' "; however, the court found that "[d]espite the contract's employment provision, Moon's claims still arise under the FLSA and New Jersey statutes, not the agreement itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“point[ed] to disputes related to the agreement at issue,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“decide what the arbitration provision says”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.