United States v. Dailey’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.3d 322 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1035 (§ 244 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395F (§ 1814 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Ballard v. Burton · United States v. Robinson · United States v. Ellender · United States v. Simkanin · United States v. Grant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial latitude in formulating jury instructions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.