Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.3d 66 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. · Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc. · At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion · AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By creating an Uber account, you agree to the TERMS OF SERVICE & PRIVACY POLICY.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he entire screen is visible at once , and the user does not need to scroll beyond what is immediately visible to find notice of the Terms of Service,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a clear prompt directing users to read the Terms and Conditions and signaling that their acceptance of the benefit of registration would be subject to contractual terms.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.