Clayton v. Biter’s Empirical Analysis
868 F.3d 840 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Estelle v. McGuire · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Blackledge v. Allison · Dillon v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing an application for a second or successive habeas petition, we do not assess the cognizability of that petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turner v. Baker“(quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473 , 486, 120 S.Ct. 1595 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000) ) ). To be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.