Anglemyer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
315
cited by 315 later decisions
6
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
314 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Cunningham v. California · Childress v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 315 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if we cannot say with confidence that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence had it properly considered reasons that enjoy support in the record.”
46 later decisions quote this exact passage“may revise a sentence authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the trial court's decision, the Court finds that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.”
31 later decisions quote this exact passage“the trial court must enter a statement including reasonably detailed reasons or cireumstances for imposing a particular sentence.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Cardwell v. State · Eiler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.