Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 868 P.2d 379 - People v. Allen

People v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2017

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

180199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Brown v. Ohio · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of .two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.... A single act may be an offense against two statutes; and if each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not, an acquittal or conviction under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not bar a subsequent prosecution where at least one of the elements of the offense in the second prosecution is different from the elements of the offense in the first prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Harris has been interpreted as requiring a court to ... compare whether the proof of one offense is incorporated in the proof of the elements of the other offense.”). . The”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.