State v. Wood’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably State v. Menzies (1994), State v. Easter (1996)
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Callis v. People · Sivak v. State · Blankenship v. State · State v. Hill · Thompson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) A defendant may be convicted of an offense included in the offense charged but may not be convicted of both the offense charged and the included offense. An offense is so included when: (a) It is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Betha · State v. Finlayson“To identify a lesser included offense, we must first determine if the lesser offense is 'established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Smith“[njo additional facts or separate elements are required to prove aggravated robbery after first degree murder based on the predicate offense of aggravated robbery is shown”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Bond
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.