Barrett v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2017
3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bishop · State v. Thurman · State v. James · Hamblin v. City of Clearfield · Davis v. Meno Guaranty Bank of Meno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“about [a potential juror's] exposure to tort-reform and medical negligence propaganda.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the traditional reluctance” of trial courts to allow questions that would prejudice defendants by “infus[ing] the issue of insurance coverage into jury deliberations,” id. at 98 , applied a two-step pre-existing framework for determining the voir dire process to be followed when a plaintiff seeks to ascertain whether potential jurors have been exposed to tort reform campaigns or advertisements by industry defendants. See id. at 99-103 . Applying this framework, the court con-eluded that the plaintiff had made an”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barcai v. Betwee“We review challenges to the trial court's management of jury voir dire under an abuse of discretion standard. Generally, the trial court is afforded broad discretion in conducting voir dire, 'but that discretion must be exercised in favor of allowing discovery of biases or prejudice in prospective jurors'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.