Begue v. Crossover, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 737 So. 2d 41 - Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc. · 704 So. 2d 1161 - Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp. · 610 So. 2d 953 - Dyson v. State Emp. Group Ben. Program · 642 So. 2d 1291 - Manuel v. Wal-Mart Stores · 694 So. 2d 1178 - Jackson v. Savant Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conditions that are caused by a progressive deterioration. Carter v. New Orleans Fire Department, 94-0338, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/17/94), 646 So.2d 455, 459 . However, it has been established that if the claimant is able to identify an event marking the time the injury occurred or the symptoms arose or suddenly or markedly increased in severity, even if such event occurs during the performance of customary or routine work activities, the employee has established an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Accident” means an unexpected or unforeseen-actual, identifiable, precipitous event happening suddenly or violently, with or without human fault, and directly producing at . the time objective findings of an injury -which is more than simply a gradual deterioration or progressive degeneration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.