Lang v. Lutz’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Croft v. Alder · 753 So. 2d 1057 - McNeil v. Hester · 511 So. 2d 112 - Dethlefs v. Beau Maison Development Corp. · 446 So. 2d 575 - Murray v. Laird · 631 So. 2d 812 - Murphy v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the circumstances give rise to a presumption of undue influence, the burden of going forward with the proof shifts to the grantee/beneflciary to prove by clear and convincing evidence: (1) good faith on the part of the grantee/beneflciary; (2) grantor’s full knowledge and deliberation of his actions and their consequences; and (3) advice of (a) a competent person, (b) disconnected from the grantee and (c) devoted wholly to the grantor/testator’s interest”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he action for slander of title was therefore rendered moot when the chancellor entered his judgment setting aside the conveyance which was the subject of the slander of title suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.