Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

868 So. 2d 406

Verzone v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 2003-06-27

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2011

4 state decisions

Relies on 564 So. 2d 860 - Ex Parte Wood · Ex Parte Verzone · 724 So. 2d 77 - State v. Saxton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-06-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

¶2In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte Verzone, 868 So.2d 399 (Ala.2003), we reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand this case to the trial court for proceedings that are consistent with that opinion. We note that, based on Ex parte Wood, 564 So.2d 860 (Ala.1990), and State v. Saxton, 724 So.2d 77 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), it appears that the State may, if it so chooses, rein-dict the appellant for the first-degree robbery of Juliann Bradford.

¶3REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McMILLAN, PH., and COBB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.
/868/so2d/406 · .json · Public domain