Joseph v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Gaines · United States v. Gaind · Quinn v. Metropolitan Dade County Aviation Department · 733 So. 2d 1079 - Page v. State · 798 So. 2d 809 - Acosta v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The defendant] was not asked for his opinion of the detective's credibility. [He] was not required to choose between conceding the point or branding the detective as a liar. Asking whether another witness is 'wrong,' 'not accurate,' or 'mistaken' is very different from asking whether the witness is a liar.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. M.H. v. State · M.H. v. State“Asking a witness whether a previous witness who gave conflicting testimony is 'mistaken' highlights the objective conflict without requiring the witness to condemn the prior witness a purveyor of deliberate falsehood, i.e., a 'liar.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. M.H. v. State · M.H. v. State“The witness was not required to choose between conceding the point or branding another witness as a liar.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. M.H. v. State · M.H. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.