868 So. 2d 512
868 So.2d 512
29 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 98
Decided March 4, 2004
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2004-03-04
Cited by 73 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably 96 So. 3d 412 - State v. Adkins (2012), 76 So. 3d 991 - Maestas v. State (2011)
2 district · 65 state decisions
Relies on FLA. DHSMV v. Critchfield · McCormick v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-03-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We have on appeal a decision of a district court of appeal declaring invalid a state statute. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So.2d 782 (Fla.2003), we summarily affirm the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in McCormick v. State, 826 So.2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
¶2It is so ordered.