Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · State v. Vazquez · 801 So. 2d 877 - Overton v. State · 405 So. 2d 177 - DePiso v. Hamel · 789 So. 2d 1016 - Henderson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he improper admission of evidence concerning a defendant's prior criminal history is frequently too prejudicial for the jury to disregard, regardless of any curative instruction given by the trial court,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] mistrial is appropriate only where the error is so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Id. at 547 . In Anderson , the prosecutor made comments in closing about how drug traffickers behave when they are stopped by the police. The court stated that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for mistrial and stated that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.