Hardeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2017
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 159 Tex. Crim. 602 - Dempsey v. State · Lucas v. State · Knox v. State · Stephens v. State · Trippell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record but only if the crime was a felony or involved moral turpitude, regardless of punishment, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ludwig v. State“[M]isdemeanor assault, as defined by Penal Code § 22.01, by a man against a woman is a crime involving moral turpitude.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lipscomb v. Randall“grave infringement of the moral sentiment of the community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lipscomb v. Randall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.