Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 120 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Bonham State Bank v. Beadle (1995), IKB Industries (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp. (1997)
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 120 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio))
Relationships
Relies on 112 Wash. 2d 216 - Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Milligan v. Southern Express, Inc. · Delaney v. University of Houston · Hopkins v. Spring Independent School Dist. · Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & Handicapped
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On appeal from the trial on the merits, if venue was improper it shall in no event be harmless error and shall be reversible error. In determining whether venue was or was not proper, the appellate court shall consider the entire record, including the trial on the merits.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he mentally incompetent are less likely than children to have someone intimately interested in their welfare and inclined to act on their behalf.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) in the county in which all or a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred; (2) in the county of defendant’s residence at the time the cause of action accrued if defendant is a natural person; (3) in the county of the defendant’s principal office in this state, if the defendant is not a natural person; or (4) if Subdivisions (1), (2), and (3) do not apply, in the county in which the plaintiff, resided at the time of the accrual of the cause of action.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.