Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 868 SW2D 781 - Stapleton v. State

Stapleton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2015

14 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Narvaiz v. State · Crane v. State · Edwards v. State · Skillern & Sons, Inc. v. Rosen · Juhasz v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) General Provision. The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in ques- 1 tion is what its proponent claims. (b) Illustrations. By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation, the following are examples of authentication or identification conforming with the requirements of this rule: [[Image here]] (6). Telephone conversations. Telephone conversations, by evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time by the telephone company to a particular person or business, if: (A) in the case of a person, circumstances, including self-identification, show the person answering to be the one called; or (B) in the case of a business, the call was made to a place of business and the conversation related to business reasonably transacted over the telephone.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.