Antrim v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2015
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re King's Estate · Cain v. Bain · Pool v. Ford Motor Co. · Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co. · Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ontraband means the proceeds gained from the commission of a felony under Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code (Texas Controlled Substances Act), a felony under Chapter 483 Health and Safety Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[m]oney is subject to forfeiture if it is derived from or intended for use in manufacturing, delivering, selling, or possessing a controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Id. (quoting Money of the United States $8,500.00 v. State, 774 S.W.2d 788, 792 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, no writ)). However,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.