Duncan v. Storie’s Empirical Analysis
869 F.2d 1100 · 1989
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Lyons v. City of Xenia (2005), Greiner v. City of Champlin (1994)
31 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Johnson v. United States · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · United States v. Watson · Welsh v. Wisconsin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] warrantless arrest that occurs inside an individual's home is unconstitutional unless the officers demonstrate the existence of probable cause and exigent circumstances.... It is well established that a warrantless arrest within the confines of the home, barring exigent circumstances, is unconstitutional.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In Santana . . . the suspect was not summoned to the door. In fact, she was already standing in the open doorway of her home when the police arrived and identified themselves.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McClish v. Nugent“It was, however, the existence of exigent circumstances [in Santana ] — a true hot pursuit — that permitted the officers to pursue the suspect inside her house.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McClish v. Nugent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.