Dupuis v. Secretary of Health & Human Services’s Empirical Analysis
869 F.2d 622 · 1989
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 48 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Nguyen v. Chater (1999), 122 Wash. 2d 397 - Tapper v. Employment Security Department (1993)
8 federal appellate · 48 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · Beavers v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · United States v. Figueroa · Raymond R. DA ROSA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“complaints of pain need not be precisely corroborated by objective findings, but they must be consistent with medical findings.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Appeals Council is in the same position as the ALJ to evaluate objective medical evidence and it need not defer to the ALJ's interpretation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.