No. 87-5298’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2012
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · United States v. Turkette · Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. · Bowsher v. SmithKline Corp. · United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of $2,857.00
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“establish that he has done all that he could reasonably be expected to do to prevent the proscribed use of the property. It is enough, under the statute, that the owner establish that the proscribed act was committed”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“of an owner who proved not only that he was uninvolved in and unaware of the wrongful activity, but also that he had done all that reasonably could be expected to prevent the proscribed use of his property....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Intent is determinative, under the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 91-5200
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.