Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 869 F.2d 999 - Smith v. Kaldor

Smith v. Kaldor’s Empirical Analysis

869 F.2d 999 · 1989

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
June 2007
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2007

14 federal appellate ·

210198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 4303 · 5 U.S.C. § 7121 · 5 U.S.C. § 7511 · 5 U.S.C. § 7512

Relies on Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Brown v. General Services Administration · Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · McDonald v. City of West Branch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In cases where a person is covered by a negotiated grievance procedure permitting allegations of discrimination, a person wishing to file a complaint or grievance on a matter of alleged employment discrimination must elect the forum in which to pursue the matter: either the process described in this part or a negotiated grievance procedure. An aggrieved employee who files a grievance in writing with an agency whose negotiated agreement with an employee organization permits the acceptance of grievance which allege discrimination prohibited by this subpart, may not thereafter file [an EEO] complaint on the same matter under the provisions of this subpart irrespective of whether the grievance has raised an allegation of discrimination within the negotiated grievance procedure. 6”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “within 30 days of receipt of notice of final action taken by a department, agency, or unit referred to in ... this section or by the [EEOC] upon appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “under the statutory procedure or the negotiated procedure but not both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.