Norris v. Causey’s Empirical Analysis
869 F.3d 360 · 2017
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Farrar v. Hobby · United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa · Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc. · 597 So. 2d 439 - STATE, DOTD v. Williamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [plaintiffs'] injury is clear: They lost thousands of dollars. They argue that [the defendants'] diversion of funds caused that injury. And this litigation can redress the loss through damages, as the judgment demonstrates.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“one who sells his interest in a cause of action is not deprived of Article III standing, but he is susceptible to a real-party-in-interest challenge”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.