In re Tibbetts’s Empirical Analysis
869 F.3d 403 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · McCleskey v. Zant · Ford v. Wainwright · Panetti v. Quarterman · Baze v. Rees
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the abuse of the writ doctrine, a numerically second petition is 'second' when it raises a claim that could have been raised in the first petition but was not so raised, either due to deliberate abandonment or inexcusable neglect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Wogenstahl“the phrase 'second or successive' 'must be interpreted with respect to the judgment challenged.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Wogenstahl“the events giving rise to the claim had not yet occurred”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Wogenstahl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.