Associated Builders & Contractors v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 50
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“employers will be forced to calculate wages and benefits on covered projects separately from other projects, creating an ongoing administrative system”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“impair the ability of a plan to function simultaneously in a number of states.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.