Davids v. Coyhis’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2014
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 2702 (§ 3 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2705 (§ 6 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2710 (§ 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2713 (§ 14 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988)
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · United States v. Testan · Cort v. Ash · Morton v. Mancari · United States v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ngaging in gaming pursuant to the IGRA constitutes an express waiver of sovereignimmunity on the issue of compliance with the IGRA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[I]t is still the law of the land that "a waiver of sovereign immunity 'cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.'" Santa Clara Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976) (quoting United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 (1969))) (emphasis added).... I believe that Supreme Court precedent constrains me from finding an unequivocal expression of a waiver of tribal sovereign immunity through inference from a tribe's actions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Santa Clara Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976) (quoting United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 (1969))) (emphasis added).... I believe that Supreme Court precedent constrains me from finding an unequivocal expression of a waiver of tribal sovereign immunity through inference from a tribe's actions. Davids, 869 F. Supp. at 1408 (part of citations omitted). The court thus concluded that the community had not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.