Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 869 NE2D 489 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2015

6 state decisions

4020072010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cox v. State · Alspach v. State · Bush v. State · Richardson v. State · Roberts v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]oth parties agree[d] that for methamphetamine to have been manufactured, [the defendant] would still have had to extract the methamphetamine from the substance found in the pitcher and then allowed it to dry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.