Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

869 So. 2d 1231

Docket No. 2D02-2573.

Gonzalez v. State

Wesley GONZALEZ, a/k/a Michael D. Gonzalez, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-03-26

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2007

4 state decisions

Relies on 821 So. 2d 263 - Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms—Stepparent Adoption Forms · LS v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Wesley Gonzalez, pro se.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge.

¶4Wesley Gonzalez appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion for an injunction to prevent the State from obtaining a blood sample from him for DNA analysis under section 943.325, Florida Statutes (2002). We find no merit to his argument that the statute is unconstitutional. *1232See L.S. v. State,805 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), review denied,821 So.2d 297 (Fla.2002). However, we agree, and the State concedes, that the felony Gonzalez committed, conspiracy to commit sexual battery, is not presently one of the felonies enumerated in section 943.325 requiring Gonzalez to submit to DNA testing.

¶5Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order denying the motion for an injunction. On remand, the trial court shall enter a temporary injunction or a stay restraining the State from requiring Gonzalez to submit a blood specimen.

¶6Reversed and remanded.

¶7DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

/869/so2d/1231 · .json · Public domain