Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 869 SO2D 1239 - Zuniga v. State

Zuniga v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 837 So. 2d 366 - Reed v. State · Motley v. State · 831 So. 2d 1263 - Giles v. State · Rich v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “More specifically, the forcible felony instruction is given in situations where the accused is charged with at least two criminal acts, the act for which the accused is claiming self-defense as well as a separate forcible felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “However, the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm is not justifiable if you find: 1. DAVID BROZEY was attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of Murder — Second Degree. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although Zuniga did not raise this issue at trial, we conclude that the erroneous instruction was fundamental error in this case. The only disputed issue at trial was whether Zuniga acted in self-defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.