¶1The appellants have filed this appeal seeking review of an order entitled “Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.” This order determined that the court is required to sustain the decisions of the defendants, who are governmental entities. However, because this order does not enter judgment, this appeal is premature and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). “To be appealable as a final order, an order must contain unequivocal language of finality.” See, e.g., Hoffman v. Hall, 817 So.2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
869 So. 2d 1275
Clemmons v. Washington County
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 20, 2004
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-04-20
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2004
1 state decisions
Relies on Benton v. Moore · 817 So. 2d 1057 - Hoffman v. Hall
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-04-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →