Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

869 So. 2d 1275

Clemmons v. Washington County

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-04-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2004

1 state decisions

Relies on Benton v. Moore · 817 So. 2d 1057 - Hoffman v. Hall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-04-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellants have filed this appeal seeking review of an order entitled “Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.” This order determined that the court is required to sustain the decisions of the defendants, who are governmental entities. However, because this order does not enter judgment, this appeal is premature and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). “To be appealable as a final order, an order must contain unequivocal language of finality.” See, e.g., Hoffman v. Hall, 817 So.2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
/869/so2d/1275 · .json · Public domain