869 So. 2d 533 - Lofton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 455 So. 2d 253 - Beaver v. State · Ingram v. State · Roberson v. State · Ex Parte Carrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In regard to any claims by a defendant that his constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated, a court must look at the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the particular claims and apply the four-part test set out in the landmark case of Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The length of delay is to some extent a triggering mechanism. Until there is some delay which is presumptively prejudicial, there is no necessity for inquiry into the other factors that go into the balance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.