869 So. 2d 754 - State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 545 So. 2d 838 - Lambert v. State · 383 So. 2d 219 - Eutsey v. State · 478 So. 2d 429 - Vandeneynden v. State · 644 So. 2d 81 - Roberts v. State · State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“since the defendant's violation of probation triggered the resentencing, the defendant is not being sentenced for precisely the same conduct and double jeopardy concerns do not come into play.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carrigan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.