Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 869 SO2D 760 - FLORIDA DCFS v. McKim

FLORIDA DCFS v. McKim’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 626 So. 2d 691 - Florida Bar v. Camp · Cleveland v. Florida Department of Children & Families District: 07 Seminole Unit 55205

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`It is a settled rule of statutory construction that unambiguous language is not subject to judicial construction, however wise it may seem to alter the plain language. . . . We trust that if the legislature did not intend the result mandated by the statute's plain language, the legislature itself will amend the statute at the next opportunity.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]here a department's construction of a statute is inconsistent with clear statutory [and rule] language it must be rejected, notwithstanding how laudable the goals of that department [may be].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.