Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

869 So. 2d 773

Kot v. Holmberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-04-14

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2004

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-04-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In determining the petition for incapacity of Rosalie J. Klein, the probate court heard testimony regarding the execution of an amendment to Ms. Klein’s revocable trust. Although the trust was not before the court, in its order determining incapacity the court adjudged “that the 1994 trust agreement continues in full force and effect and the assets of the ward shall be continued to be controlled by the then nominated guardian Bruni Holmberg.” The validity of the trust was never before the court for determination, as appellee concedes and the court acknowledged in other parts of the order. Therefore, we affirm the order, except as to the foregoing statement, which on remand we direct be stricken from the order.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/869/so2d/773 · .json · Public domain