¶1Denied. The result is correct. See Lilly v. Virginia,527 U.S. 116, 139-40, 119 S.Ct. 1887, 1901, 144 L.Ed.2d 117 (1999) (Erroneous *816 admission of accomplice's confession subject to harmless error analysis).
869 So. 2d 815
Docket No. 2003-K-2822.
State v. Alexander
STATE of Louisiana v. James "T. K." ALEXANDER.
Decided March 12, 2004.
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2004-03-12
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2018
6 state decisions
Relies on Lilly v. Virginia
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-03-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →