Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

869 S.W.2d 258

State v. Bullock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1993

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1993-12-28

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-12-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2013

12 state decisions

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of forcible rape in violation of § 566.030, RSMo Supp.1990, and two counts of forcible sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo Supp.1990, on which he was sentenced to consecutive terms of fifteen years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from an order denying on the merits, after a hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion asserting non-cognizable trial error and ineffective assistance of counsel. However, defendant has abandoned this appeal by failing to brief any errors with respect to the denial of post-conviction relief.

¶3With respect to the direct appeal, no error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

/869/sw2d/258 · .json · Public domain