Boyd v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2016
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Laughlin v. Boatmen's National Bank · 231 Mo. App. 560 - Rice v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance · Ragan v. Schreffler · Counts v. Morrison-Knudsen, Inc. · Service Construction Company v. Nichols
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Rule 55.31: A party cannot object that no demand for the subject matter of a civil action was made prior to its institution unless it is expressly set up by way of defense in the answer or reply and is also accompanied with a tender of the amount or thing that is due[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moran v. Hubbartt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.