Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 869 SW2D 317 - Dillard v. Dickens

Dillard v. Dickens’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2013

4 state decisions

20199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGuire v. Tenneco, Inc. · Ceradsky v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. · Rector v. City of Springfield · Montgomery v. Mine La Motte Corporation · Frazier v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to categorize an individual as a statutory employee, each of three statutory elements must coexist: (1) the work was being performed pursuant to a contract; (2) the injury occurred on or about the premises of the alleged statutory employer; and (3) when injured the alleged statutory employee was performing work which was in the usual course of business of the alleged statutory employer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.