Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 869 S.W.2d 342 - Bishop v. State

Bishop v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Lane v. State (1996), Wheeler v. State (2002)

39 state decisions

210199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Harris v. State · Plante v. State · Beets v. State · Arcila v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]vidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not provide evidence of actions so unusual and distinctive and so nearly identical to the charged offense as to amount to a `signature.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.