Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 869 SW2D 35 - Commonwealth v. Hicks

Commonwealth v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2017

20 state decisions

90199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. · Polk v. Wimsatt · Crawley v. Kunzman · Allen v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless the court in its order for dismiss-ál otherwise specifies, a dismissal under this Rule, and any dismissal not provided for in Rule 41, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, for improper venue, for want of prosecution under Rule 77.02(2), or for failure to join a party under Rule 19, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the result would be the destruction of any certainty as to the effect of judgments and a state of chaos in judicial proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In such a circumstance, the Commonwealth was entitled to go forward and the trial judge was without authority to dismiss the case. We reiterate, it is not the province of a trial court to determine that a case should be dismissed contrary to the wishes of a party who has announced ready for trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.