¶1ORDER
¶2Defendant, Phillip Webster, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, for robbery in the second degree. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to imprisonment for twenty years. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.
¶3We have reviewed defendant’s direct appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
¶4The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).