Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 Ala. 23

Andy v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1888

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1888-12-15

<p> Indictment for Robbery. </p> <p>1. Severance of trial. — Under the statute now of force (Code, § 4451), when two or more persons are jointly indicted, either one of them is entitled to a severance as matter of right, if he claims it in proper time.</p>

Relies on Hawkins v. State · Wade v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1888-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1983

3 state decisions

1018881890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CLOPTON, J.

¶1On the day set for the trial, but before a jury was organized, appellant, who was jointly indicted with others, moved for a severance as to himself. Section 4451 of Code of 1886 declares: “When two or more defendants are jointly indicted; they may be tried either jointly or separately, as either may elect.” Under the statute, as it stood prior to this enactment, and also in the absence of statutory regulations, it was held, that the allowance of a separate trial was discretionary with the court. — Code, 1876, § 4892; Hawkins v. State, 9 Ala. 137; Wade v. State, 40 Ala. 74. The purpose and operation of section 4451 are to abrogate the former rule, and to entitle either defendant to a separate trial as matter of right. Under the present statute, when two or more persons are jointly indicted, and *24either so elects in proper time, the allowance of a separate trial is imperative.

¶2Reversed and remanded.

¶3Note.' — See Rule of Practice, since adopted, regulating severances. — 86 Ala. vm.

/87/ala/23 · .json · Public domain