Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 CALAPP3D 604 - Danzig v. Superior Court

Danzig v. Superior Court’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
April 2000
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2000

11 state decisions

701978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 4 Cal. 3d 800 - Vasquez v. Superior Court · 67 Cal. 2d 695 - Daar v. Yellow Cab Co. · 5 Cal. 3d 864 - La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n · Dellums v. Powell · 18 Cal. 3d 355 - Occidental Land, Inc. v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We hold that in order for a defendant to have discovery of unnamed members of a plaintiff class by means of interrogatories, the defendant must carry the burden of showing that (a) such interrogatories request only such information as is necessary to trial of the class issues in the case, (b) such information is not readily obtainable from other sources, and (c) the interrogatories are neither unduly burdensome nor promulgated for an improper purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.