Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 Conn. 323 - Maley v. Hugo

Maley v. Hugo’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1936
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Loomis · Parks v. Sheldon · Doolan v. Wilson · Lannen v. Cimenera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant contends that the conclusions of the trial court are not warranted by the evidence, . . . and we are asked to correct the finding. This we cannot do if it appears that there was evidence from which the court below could have reasonably reached the conclusions complained of.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.