Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 F. 453

Docket No. 522.

In re Thomas

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1898.)

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1898-04-05

<p>Oleomargarine — Use in National Soldiers5 Home — Regulation by State.</p> <p>The. governor of the Soldiers’ Home at Dayton, Ohio, in serving to the inmates as food oleomargarine furnished by the government, is not subject to the law of the state prescribing the manner in which oleomargarine shall be used in eating houses. The legislature haying no power to regulate the conduct of such institution, the statute is to be construed as not applying thereto.</p>

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““Inasmuch as the Legislature * * * had no power to regulate the conduct of this administrative agency of the national government by such a statute as is here in question, it ought to he presumed that the Legislature did not intend it to have such an application, and that the statute should be construed accordingly.””

quoted by 2 later decisions, including University of the South v. Jetton, Pundt v. Pendleton

Relies on Edwards' Lessee v. Darby · Campbell v. United States · In re Thomas

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1898-04-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2008

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

30189819001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Oleomargarine — Use in National Soldiers5 Home — Regulation by State.

¶2The. governor of the Soldiers’ Home at Dayton, Ohio, in serving to the inmates as food oleomargarine furnished by the government, is not subject to the law of the state prescribing the manner in which oleomargarine shall be used in eating houses. The legislature haying no power to regulate the conduct of such institution, the statute is to be construed as not applying thereto.

¶3Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio.

¶4This was an application by J. B. Thomas, governor of the Soldiers’ Home at Dayton, Ohio, for a writ of habeas corpus to release him from imprisonment under state process for alleged violation of the state statutes in serving to the iumates of the Home oleomargarine, without first complying with the state regulations in that regard. The petitioner was discharged by the circuit court (82 Fed. 304), and the present appeal was taken from its order.

¶5C. H. Dosier and D. L. Sleeper, for appellant.

¶6Judson Harmon and D. W. Bowman, for appellee.

¶7Before BURTON, Circuit Judge, and SEVERENS and CLARK, District Judges.

¶8PER CURIAM.

¶9The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of Taft, circuit judge, who heard the case in the court below. His opinion is reported in 82 Fed. 304. With respect to the question of law involved, we concur in the reasoning upon which Judge Taft’s opinion proceeds (and which we are content to adopt as our own), and in the conclusion which he reached, save that we prefer to resi our approval of the order made by the court below upon the ground that, inasmuch as the legislature of Ohio had no power to regulate (he conduct of this administrative agency of the national government by such a statute as is here in question, it ought to be presumed that the legislature did not intend it to have such au application, and that the statute should be construed accordingly. The order of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

/87/f1d/453 · .json · Public domain