Amaral v. Cleary

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 18, 1937.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1937-01-18

3 counsel of record

Relies on Borges v. Loftis

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1937-01-18

¶1No. 8351:

¶2 *997No. 8407:

¶3J. L. Royle, of Fresno, Cal., and Grove J. Fink, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

¶4Leslie A. Cleary, Dist. Atty., and Frank B. Collier, Dep. Dist. Atty., both of Modesto, Cal., for appellees Cleary et al.

¶5F. A. Silveira, Dist. Atty., of Merced, Cal., for appellees Cornell et al.

¶6Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8These causes coming before this court on the transcripts of record, and stipulations of counsel that these causes abide the decision of this court in companion cause, Borges v. Loftis (No. 8406), 87 F. (2d) 734, in which a decree of affirmance is this day entered, it is ordered that a decree of affirmance be filed and entered in each of above causes.