Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 F.3d 1049 - Marx

Marx’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Graves, Goodwin v. Mickey Thompson Entertainment Group, Inc. (In Re Mickey Thompson Entertainment Group, Inc.) (2003)

3 district · 4 state decisions

410199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Withrow v. Williams · Carballo v. United States · Miller v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the danger of prejudice to the party opposing the late filing, (2) the length of the delay and its potential impact on proceedings, (3) the reason why the filing was late and whether that reason or reasons were within the filer’s reasonable control, and (4) the filer’s good or bad faith. These circumstances must be weighed both with and against each other because, if considered separately, they may not all point in the same direction in a particular case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the issue presented is purely one of law and either does not depend on the factual record developed below or the pertinent record has been fully developed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Plaintiffs have demonstrated that consultation difficulties hindered their prompt pursuit of appeal. There is no evidence of prejudice to the Defendants or to judicial administration, and certainly no indication of bad faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.