Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 F.3d 1194 - United States v. Shields

United States v. Shields’s Empirical Analysis

87 F.3d 1194 · 1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
March 2014
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2014

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

120199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 18 U.S.C. § 841 (Amendments of 1973 to Federal Law) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co. · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Landry · San Vicente Medical Partners, Ltd. v. Orr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “nothing in [§ 2D1.1(c) (n.* (E)) ] ... suggests that [its] application depends upon whether the marijuana plants are harvested before or after authorities apprehend the grower”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we apply the guidelines in effect at the time of a defendant's sentencing hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.