Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 F.3d 1271 - Wallace v. Morrison

Wallace v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis

87 F.3d 1271 · 1996

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
10
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably United States v. Tokars (1996), Kesser v. Cambra (2006)

17 federal appellate · 12 state decisions — followed in 10 states

190199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Hernandez v. New York · United States v. Darden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “after the defendant makes a prima facie showing of discrimination, the state may raise the affirmative defense that the strike would have been exercised on the basis of the [ ]neutral reasons and in the absence of the discriminatory motive. If the state makes such a showing, the peremptory challenge survives constitutional scrutiny.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A person may act for more than one reason”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.